|
Luc & the Orekit gang!
Count a vote from me to use the more common parameters.
cheers,
- MikeCorvin
This e-mail and message, including all attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, or the employee, or agent responsible to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, dissemination, downloading, copying, or taking of action based on the contents of this message is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender of the e-mail, and delete the e-mail immediately from your computer.
wrote:
Le 24/09/2014 18:29, Christophe Le Bris a écrit :
Hello,
Hi Christophe,
I have some doubt about the computation of the reflectivity coefficient
used in SRP acceleration for a spherical spacecraft.
We have: Ca (absorption) + Cs (specular) + Cd (diffuse) = 1
and, for a spherical spacecraft, after integration on the sphere, I
expect the reflectivity coefficient Cp to be:
Cp = 1 + 4/9 * Cd
So, if using only Ca and Cs, I would expect to have: Cp = 1 + 4/9 * (1 -
Ca - Cs).
But, in the SphericalSpacecraft class, the value is:
1 + 4/9 * (1 - Ca) * (1 - Cs)
Is it an error in Orekit or am I missing something on reflectivity
computation?
You have found one of the design choices in Orekit we regret the most...
It is not an error, it is a problem of definition of the coefficients.
When developing this part, we used as a reference the book Spaceflight
Dynamics (part I), which was a collective work done in 1995 at CNES.
This book is sometimes called "the 95 book". In this book, section 5.2
delas with radiative forces. In section 5.2.2.1.3.1 (page 296 of the
English edition), the absorption coefficient alpha and specular
reflexion coefficient tau are defined. These are the coefficients we use
in Orekit. Later in section 5.2.2.1.3.2 there is a comment (comment 1
page 299 of the English edition) that reads:
Some authors prefer to express thermo-optical properties for surfaces
using the following coefficients:
Ka = alpha, Ks = (1-alpha)tau, Kd = (1-alpha)(1-tau)
These are the coefficients you are used too and it explains the
different formulas. Experience showed that in fact these coefficients
are the ones almost everyone else use, so we should have selected these
ones for better compatibility with existing systems.
We are *really* not happy with our previous choice and your question
raises this concern again.
So I would like to ask a question to the community at large: do you want
us to deprecate the older SphericalSpacecraft class that uses this
uncommon definition and replace it with another class (name to be found)
using the more common K{a,s,d} coefficients?
best regards
Luc
Thank you
Christophe
|